What Happens When You Are In A Comma

The disgraced guarantor

See Brancher and wonder where you got the wrong
Antonio Polito

One passes most of his adult life to support that Berlusconi is not a criminal but a political phenomenon that has happened because the Knight has a message and not just half ( television), which won the elections because it embodies an idea and a hope and not because Italy is made up of a majority of tax evaders and corrupt who identifies with him. One pass

years to say that Berlusconi must be understood and not demonized, even in his lies that there is some truth. That, of course, he makes the laws to save himself from prosecution, but also the processes that are not really all bomb-proof. That, of course, can not afford to insult the judiciary and to challenge the constitutional autonomy of the judiciary, but to see how they behave and how certain judges sometimes use their independence it is clear that the Italian justice has still an urgent need for radical reform.

One takes us back to the face and even some friendship to explain that even the immunity pro-tempore for the head of government is not in itself a blasphemy, which indeed in some countries is expected, and anyway there is need to protect the exercise of popular mandate.

Then Berlusconi, under cover of darkness, saying nothing to anybody, appointing his friend, fellow defendant and Aldo Brancher Minister of nowhere, and Aldo Brancher shall immediately - instead of federalism - the legal impediment to prevent his trial. And you wonder where you are wrong.

from "The Reform", Fri. June 25, 2010

How Much Is A Corn Removal

face on the interception (from "Free" 's June 11, 2010) A dialogue on justice

"What scares gazzettieri of proxy
F. Let us

E'incredibile, all lie. That mind is the best, because otherwise we think that Ferruccio De Bortoli and Greve and Luigi Vittorio Ferrarella (Courier) and Mario and Massimo Calabresi Gramellini (Print) and Ezio Mauro and Gustavo Zagrebelsky (Republic) and many others, virtually all , not so much ignore the new rule on the secret investigation, but the previous one, ie the current, that launched in 1989. What does the old rule, alias Articles 684 and 329 of the Code of Criminal Procedure? He says that an act of investigation is no longer secret after a suspected it comes to his knowledge - and so far we have - but adds that it is equally forbidden to publish the text in quotation marks an interrogation or an interception, if I may say publish the content (the famous 'summary') but no text. So what's the difference with the new standard? Here it is, very Italian: the difference is that if they are all fucked up now, because it was provided for only a ridiculous fine of 130 € (with oblation, that is without even a trial) while the new draft law provides for penalties to journalists and editors can not be overlooked, if any. It's like the law Sirchia on smoke bans even before there were all identical, but they were bland and then gives a damn.
But there's more: The new standard, in theory, is more permissive than the last. The old article 114 of the Code of Procedure, in fact, in the second paragraph read as follows: "It is prohibited to publish, even in part, acts no longer be confidential until the preliminary investigations are concluded or until the end of the preliminary hearing 'This was the old rule, although all the violated. Well, the new permits at least the above summary for publication. In the past - in theory, we repeat - not even that.
Here, then, the real difference between this and the previous law, and all those proposals in recent years, including this Decree Mastella that the Prodi government had tried to launch even more severe current: the difference is that this law c ' is the risk that it works. Only the risk, we fear. And what they are writing, however, all the newspapers? We talk, badateci, including normal and decent fellow, not only of those dipietrini Travaglini and every day are incapable of circumvention. They write lies. They write that there can be no more "informative" write "the truth" 'News', things like that, slogans. The main newspapers are long lists of scandals "that we can no longer know" even if it is true, taken one by one we'd been able to know more about everyone, although without reference to any person outside the investigation and even tried. Even Gomorrah, were able to memorize, and even photos of Stefano Cucchi that journalists saw before the magistrates. The "news" will still be prejudice, just sapersele provide, but do not consider "news" only that which is extracted from a binder judiciary. Just above that interest, the news: the other day, for example, the Corriere del Mezzogiorno has given Available only one that has largely taken over and we both know why. Recall that the prosecutor of Trani Michael Ruggiero, last December, had investigated the director of Tg1 Augusto Minzolini investigation to reveal the secret: this only because he had talked on the phone to call their own attorney. Well, now it turns out that the same pm Ruggiero is under investigation for the same thing, because he had previously spilled on the phone the same episode - the convening of Minzolini in proxy - a journalist. The whole thing seems strange, because it works as a photographer, often, the passage of cards and papers from judges and journalists but the news, as mentioned, has resumed only Free. It does not affect the article? Could possibly spoil the demagogic mayonnaise these days? There is one thing, under the new law, which can no longer do any form, either text or summarized: to publish the first time - before the trial, that is - the contents of interceptions. And thank you very much: it is the main reason why they made the law. Let's talk about those interceptions that no country in the world public opinion as us: yet made are democracies in which journalism and justice are very serious business. Why there and not here
yes? Because in France or the United Kingdom no idiot cries of fascism? Because directors and journalists, we do not want to admit that this is simply maintaining the status quo - to publish everything, rubbish anyone - if only to sell more copies? What then - who told sdottoreggia - in the acts and orders of arrest interceptions there should not be: because they would be the means of gathering evidence, not evidence, just like the anonymous letters, or the blow of confidence or other stuff in issue should not even enter, and which we - unique in the world - become queens instead of evidence, gossip, legal literature. Barbarism, all admit. Before publishing.

Financial Management- I M Pandey

The debate on the regulation of wiretapping must inevitably be accompanied by a reflection across the state of health and the ills that plague the administration of justice in Italy and, especially, the possible cures. A reflection of this kind is given in the dialogue between Charles and Nordio Giuliano Pisapia: "Waiting for justice. Dialogue on possible reforms "(pref. S. Romano, Guerini e Associati, 2010, 191 pp., 18, 50 €). Carlo Nordio is deputy prosecutor in Venice, "prosecutor refractory to any political stance but certainly liberal," while Giuliano Pisapia is a lawyer "on the left politically engaged" (he was elected to parliament in the ranks of the Communist PRC). Beyond the different political stance, however, the two have in common the fact that he presided over (under different governments), the Commission for the reform of the penal code and, above all, a vision of reform that would define "long term", that little attention to political contingencies-election. Romano writes in the preface, both in their constitutional duties, have come to conclusions very similar, but their proposals were not endorsed by the political class, because this "instead of working on medium and long time for the renewal of the criminal justice system, prefer to live day by day chasing the mood of public opinion or the calls from beyond the Tiber "(p. 10), with reference a measure such as a pardon or to the numerous "security packages" that were launched by governments of the center and center-right. On measures on which we can discuss (and the two authors do), but from the point of view of the method have the serious defect of not taking into consideration the long term consequences and not substantially change the underlying problems.

The book is divided into two parts, the first of which analyzes the "diseases of justice", while the second reflects on "poisons and antidotes." The second part is more delicious, because, beyond the technical issues (which are important) widens the look on some "questions of principle" that are particularly close to heart (and, I believe, are particularly dear to those who share a position "Guarantor"). For the insiders, I report only the short end ("Possible Reforms"), in which the authors summarize their proposals for reform in three sections, devoted respectively to "procedural law", the "substantive criminal law" and to "sector regulated directions." The first part, however, is important because it presents a very lucid discussion of the ills of our judicial system and, generally, the administration of justice (while the second focuses on the relationship between justice and politics); examination that, within the space of a review can not be considered in detail. Why limit myself to certain questions that "subjectively" me being me most.

interceptions

After the first chapters, devoted to long periods of Justice, the slowness of the bureaucratic machinery, resources and waste system, the fourth chapter deals with "hot-tapping. According to the North, which the dialogue takes on the role of the disenchanted realism "(while it Pisapia the part of the 'ideal generated), the reality is that the interception of telephone and environmental are "a small number of useful (and perhaps necessary), but overall they are expensive and harmful ... harmful to the citizen who suffers annoying intrusions, and the investigator who flattens them easy to carry on, giving up a more complex instruments, but also more reliable "(p. 45). interceptions, wisely handled, you may say it all, in deference to that of Richelieu, give me six lines of the most honest of men and find a way to have him hanged. interceptions, then as a "necessary evil", "evil" because they go against the art. 15 of the Constitution (which protects the freedom and privacy of our communications), "necessary" as an investigative tool, but often very poor instrument to its limits and "the dangers associated with their liberal use" (p. 46). The idea of \u200b\u200bNorth and that the interception should not be used as evidence but only as an investigative tool, "the truth is that the intercepts were processed by means of gathering evidence to test itself: elements of a dispute, and catch even convictions, then at the end are usually void "(p. 49). As for the "theory", Pisapia is less rigid, for him, in some cases, "the interceptions, including environmental, are conclusive evidence ... That said, I repeat that I am absolutely convinced the need for some changes to the current legislation "(p. 50). Both also express reservations about the reform project, because" it is wrong that we can intercept only in the presence of extremely serious crimes "(Pisapia) and reform as it is, "contains too much, and with too little ... because keeping the intercepts as evidence allows access not only to judges and police officers that have to carry them out, but the lawyers and parties entitled to select the useful points ... But it contains too little for severely limits the freedom of the press during the investigation phase "(north). Both, finally, I agree in condemning the publication of conversations (which are often criminally negligible) in print. Pisapia: "I firmly believe that the publication of wiretapping ... ... it is a barbarism - and here reflect those who decide these publications today and tomorrow could be a rude-violence victims. I have the [...] 'impression, however, that many do not want to see the barbarism in a ruling and closing the door to change. Many do not know whether in good or bad faith, they tend to confuse the right and duty to inform the alleged right to commit crimes; freedom of the press with the freedom to defame, misinform, "rubbish." Because there are loopholes: the trial must be public, investigations are not public "(p. 55).

punishment and custody

Other interesting bits are the first part of the debate on capital punishment and the use (and abuse) of preventive detention. Both are d 'agreement in condemning, in the words Pisapia, the "panpenalismo" of our system, and argued that the penalties should be increased but not decreased. The paradox is reported from north of the "profound discrepancy between the severity of penalties imposed by the Code , that is generally provided for the offenders and those actually imposed by the court ... Our system is well thought out: if you commit a crime theoretically risks a prison high, but in fact the court you will inflict a very low, and most suspended "(p. 66). Pisapia, for its part, points out that in principle all speak of the need to reach a" minimal criminal " "decriminalizing some minor offenses, so as not to overburden the courts and prisons:" We must stop the panpenalismo. Pretend that you can solve everything, including social problems, with the Penal Code is just propaganda, dangerous demagoguery. The first step is to really restrict the conduct of criminal activity to the facts really serious and punishable by appropriate administrative sanctions those offenses which do not cause disruptions or public alarm "(p.67). The use of custody, Pisapia - after reporting a chilling case happened to a senior worker arrested on charges of involvement in a criminal association, which goes to the process after 3 years of imprisonment, is sentenced to four years in the first instance, acquitted on appeal and, finally, after more than six years since the beginning of the ordeal, finally acquitted in the Supreme Court (pp. 72-73) - argues strongly that "The abuse of preventive detention is a major distortion of our criminal justice system" because "it is undeniable this would rarely be used for purposes quite different from those required by law, such as to "anticipate" the penalty (although the process could end with an acquittal) or to obtain confessions (almost necessarily that the suspect is guilty and that the assumption of departure is the presumption of guilt) "(p. 75). The problem lies not in the Code, which states that custody can be applied only if there are serious indications of guilt, and when all other measures prove inadequate (as stated in art. 275, cited by Pisapia), but in the function "unofficially" that is performed by this instrument, on remand, in cases where there is no danger to the community nor the risk of contamination of evidence used to "anticipate a sentence that is feared is not granted then even if convicted. This is not acceptable, because the concept and distorts the very meaning of justice can never be anticipated or vengeance or punishment following conviction for a future "(p. 77). The role of the CSM



Turning to the second part, the dialogue focuses primarily on the issue of constitutional reforms. Those pressing for full implementation of the adversarial process, says the north, are three: the reformulation of the structure and the election of the Superior Council of Magistracy, the elimination of mandatory prosecution and the separation of careers. As a corollary, the reintroduction of parliamentary immunity " (P. 140). Nordio Pisapia and agree that the CSM is a prisoner of the excessive power of the currents, because of one or other of these to determine the allocation of posts and promotions, while the same disciplinary investigations are influenced by the games reciprocal favors, even if there are different solutions: Pisapia opposes the reform of the CSM was approved in 2002, which reduced the number of members from 30 to 24, while "there was quite the need to increase due to the introduction of the concept of justice of the peace and the doubling of the judiciary "(p. 142), while North thought the draw as the only remedy, because" the extraction eliminate the root of lots in the bond that unites voters and elected insidious, and that raises the suspicion that ... as dog bites dog, so each judge is in fact protected by its sponsors at the time that he was asked to vote "(p. 143 ). Regarding the role of the CSM, the opinions are in agreement. According Pisapia is no longer sustainable in a situation where the auditors are elected by the controlled and, therefore, think of a "High Court" is competent to decide on matters of ethics and disciplinary procedures of those who have a role in administration of justice. Even heavier than the opinion of North notes that "concentrations of power like that judges on the lives of people and the State, free from real responsibility, it seems intolerable and, indeed, it is "the Italian public prosecutor is the chief of police, heads the investigation, and may start and perform it alone . This is similar to the U.S. district attorney. Both have a tremendous power, but in the mind Use this power is controlled by the people, as the elected prosecutor, we is not controlled by anyone. [...] From a substantive point of view, the Italian PM is the only body in the world who enjoy power without responsibility equivalent ... It 's useless to say that there is control law, appeals and the SCM, we are savvy enough and mature enough to understand that it is not formal but substantial control "(p. 145).

Prosecution and separation of careers

On the issue of mandatory prosecution, the opinions of the authors disagree. To the north, as we have said, the installation process involves the prosecution's discretion to prosecute, his ritrattabilità, the wide use of the pact, while in Italy the prosecution is required and irritrattabile, the settlements will be reduced to minimum, the careers of judges and magistrates do not distinguish between investigators. The mandatory criminal, says North, "means the duty of the magistrate to proceed whenever it becomes aware of a crime. But this principle, that in itself should ensure the equality of citizens before the law was due to a discretion in the investigation that often borders on arbitrariness "(p. 146). Pisapia, however, supports all the forces that "the mandatory prosecution remains a sacrosanct principle and the recognition of an essential value, the realization of equality of citizens before the law" and, knowing that the current situation is in fact discretion, believes that "worth fighting for the principles into reality, including possibly seeking a mediation (noble), a balance (equal) allowing you to get as close as possible to a satisfactory solution "(p. 147), because, paradoxically, the discretion to prosecute increase the power of the PM instead of reducing it. As for the separation of careers between judges and prosecutors, finally, the agreement is complete, so that North is Pisapia believe is a necessary reform. A magistrate, North points out that his colleagues are terrified of the "suspicion that the separation of careers is the antechamber of the subjection of the executive PM" but the fear is unfounded because "prosecutors may well be released by the courts and enjoy the same independence as judges may be separate from PM while being purely political appointment, as are members of the U.S. Supreme Court" ( p. 150). For its part, Pisapia adds that the separation of careers is also needed to create greater confidence in the city, because "even a child understands that once the arbitrator can not wear the uniform of jacket and another black player" and because only the actual impartiality of those who must decide between theses different, often conflicting, it can give people the necessary confidence that those who viewed both the above parties (pp. 151-2). Conclusion



outdated reference to the impartiality of the judge, who embodies the very concept of justice (for instance, the scale), back in a few important points of north, which I like to bring to a conclusion of this review. The problem is: some elements of the judiciary (and not just one) are concerned that the full implementation of the adversarial process is a weakening of the fight against corruption and the mafia. But, North rightly points out that the "fight" against corruption and the mafia is not and should not be the duty of justice - with all due respect to writers engaged Appeals to sign, that the reviewer does not name to avoid being accused of violating anti-mafia and these fears, according Nordio, resulting from the injury, "the result of good faith as a generator of bad justice" that "judges must fight against someone or something" and if one assumes that "the magistrate must attack and defeat crime, the more the process is carried out, the more the company is inadequate," but the company obviously is not the one (if not, better Torture) but if "you agree with the principles of liberal democracy, we must agree that the concept of struggle is incompatible with that of jurisdiction. The magistrates should only apply the law, absolving or condemning based on evidence gathered in an order governed by codes "(p. 155). The independence and impartiality of the judge, who comes from the independence of the law itself (which is not made for the benefit of some and against others) and is often cited in error, is an important reminder to distract the judges from performing tasks and missions "political" or, worse, "apocalyptic." The administration of justice, he remembered (opposed by anyone), Leonardo Sciascia, not a war against someone (ie, not even the war against the Mafia or "anti-mafia assault"), because war is the continuation of politics by other means and the distinction between judges and politicians is the foundation of our legal culture.

Mysore Mallige Watch Free

processes the intentions and the folly of those who say "all intercettateci"

The controversy triggered by the "Republic", so-called "purple people" and intellectuals from the usual circus on the subject of wiretapping seem a good example of the level of deterioration in the discussion, political or otherwise, in this country. The processes the intentions in these cases, should never be made, probably because if the intention of the majority in carrying out the law is not directed to the defense of "privacy", it seems equally obvious that those who oppose this law (and especially the professionals of the press and information) does not do it for the defense of press freedom. On this point he wrote, in detail, Filippo Facci in an article some time ago on "Free", in which it was said in clear words that the main reason why journalists do not want this law is that eavesdropping issue (especially if itchy) is the only way they can to increase sales of their newspapers. That is a worthy interest, for charity, but particular, and as such must be considered, no stand, however, as defenders of press freedom and freedom of information to (softly) I allow myself to doubt more and more. Moreover, for a while I wonder what the "right to be informed" that, according to our liberals (who are not liberals) should be regarded as a "duty to be informed," according to the motto "I can tell (ie: I read Travaglio), therefore I am."
In the name of duty or right to information (and the rubbish, of course), our liberals are posited opposition between privacy and press freedom at the expense of the first and the second benefit, as noted, quite rightly Worried Giovanni Belardelli "Corriere della Sera yesterday (Sun June 13). It takes little, in fact, to understand that the motto "Intercettateci all" is the negation of every principle of individual freedom and opens the door to every form of totalitarianism (Belardelli Recalls the massive use of wiretapping that was done in the GDR, but apparently does not realize that this model really like the liberals of our house). Anyone who says "intercettateci all" (or "the innocent have nothing to fear from a process", which is another formulation of the same concept) or is in bad faith or is an idiot. If it is bad faith, they are strongly encouraged to make open profession of totalitarianism (so to play cards), while in the case of idiocy, then there are remedies.
In the meantime, we highlight curious reversals in the opinions of some leading intellectual on the phenomenon of interceptions. I remember an old article by Sabino Cassese denouncing the phenomenon of interceptions, but I doubt that today, in his guise of the constitutional court, will decide in favor of the new law. The same applies to Stefano Rodota, former data protection commissioner. As evidenced by an amusing article by Paul Bracalini up the newspaper today (Monday June 14) Now the prof. Rodotà is one of the strongest supporters of the campaign of "Republic" against the law-gag, but when it still employed to ensure privacy, the same Rodotà railed against "this relentless publicizing of private spaces, this remains unknown and unwanted exposure to eyes [that] affects the individual and social behavior, [because] they know scrutinized reduces the spontaneity and freedom. "Rhetoric aside literary, fully shared. Shareable, above all, is the answer Rodotà (one yesterday, not now) provided to the prosecutor Vigna, who regarded him as a disgraced public price to pay to defend themselves from crime, "once even resorted to torture '. It is the same argument that I had used in a conversation with the guests who supported the use of wiretaps, diners which I pointed out that this is the logic of the" end justifies the means "approach to politics that is (according to Machiavelli and his followers), but not the logic of the law, for which not all means are good because it recognizes the existence of something (person, individual) who is an "end in itself."
On the other hand, if you follow the logic first, not just the interceptions should be extended (potentially all citizens) and prolonged indefinitely, but hoped it would be a situation such as that described by Philip Dick, a society in which the Judges include the crimes and the police arrest people before they can do crimes. It would be a very efficient and secure world, would not be a free world. But the right is precisely a "system of freedom" (Kant). That, today, even well-educated people think in such a distorted manner is not a good sign, and also by the legal culture arrived worrying signals. The natural rights of the individual are valid only in words, and has been for a while. If you once mentioned the radical legal positivism of Kelsen, today's "orphans of Marx" rediscover the work of Carl Schmitt (genial personality, but still sentenced at Nuremberg, and theoretician of the explicit right of the strongest).
Forfeiture of the concept of "right" and carelessness towards the "freedom" go hand in hand, which explains the insensitivity of a radical reform of justice (but we are obviously happy exception is the case of the book North and Pisapia which I'll discuss shortly). Not only that you forward a culture that not only look for solutions the problem, but denies the problem. To the cry of "intercettateci all."

Memorial Quest Book Quotes

Dance Brick


Bertolaso's house, accusing Zampolini
"She paid Anemone. Accommodations Di Pietro. Jobs in who was shown by Prodi, Veltroni, Rutelli "

(from Corriere della Sera on Wednesday 2 June)

Bertolaso's house, accusing Zampolini

" She paid Anemone. Accommodations Di Pietro. Jobs in who was shown by Prodi, Veltroni, Rutelli "

ROME -" The rent of the house in Via Giulia Guido Bertolaso \u200b\u200bI have paid me on behalf of Anemone Diego. It was a small house, Diego gave me the cash I was carrying to the owner. He also proceeded to renovate it. " It is May 18. In front of the magistrates in Perugia Zampolini Angelo says the architect. Confirms the suspicions of investigators. It contradicts the version given by the Head of Civil Protection, which was denied by the manufacturer to make available to that apartment. Then he was asked if he knows what kind of relationships were between the former Infrastructure Minister Antonio Di Pietro and Angelo Balducci. Zampolini bulldozing. But four days later asking to be interrogated again. It reveals: "I know that Balducci did the minister have two houses for rent in Rome by the Congregation Propaganda Fide. The first was on the way Vine and has been for a period of one of the sites of Italy of Values. The other was in Via delle Quattro Fontane, I think it was for her daughter. Again Anemone dealt with the restructuring. Replica of Peter: "I exclude those apartments that I have, I will ask the investigators to learn more." Zampolini The architect, who was busy buying houses for the former minister Claudio Scajola, for the general intelligence Pittorru Francis and the manager of Infrastructure Incalza Hercules - paid in part with money Anemone - thus confirms its willingness to cooperate with prosecutors investigating procurement for the "Big Events." The Carabinieri of the ROS and the Financial Police are now checking every detail, including those involving the choice of architects for the work of the G8 summit in La Maddalena, and celebrations for the Unification of Italy. "I was expelled, while working as indicated by Prodi, Veltroni and Rutelli," said Zampolini. The rent for

Bertolaso \u200b\u200band the delay of payments
Referring to an apartment Bertolaso \u200b\u200bwhich you did not know existed, is traced in its "List Anemone." Next to the name there are two addresses: one in via Bellotti Bon, where he resides with his family, and the Via Giulia. Just hours after the publication of the Department Civil Defence issued a statement to assert that "neither he nor his family have no property in that area of \u200b\u200bthe city center. For a brief period Bertolaso \u200b\u200bhas been able to use an apartment in Via Giulia, located in its availability to a friend - that was not the manufacturer Anemone - and he never noticed his stay in the business of restructuring or other construction work, which may not were within its competence or responsibility. " To deny this version we think Zampolini. "The friend - a statement made on May 18 - it is Anemone. It was he responsible for paying the rent, € 1,500 more in cash. I remember once There was a delay of about six months and poured the money together. Anemone was also in charge of the renovation of the apartment. " Of all this Bertolaso \u200b\u200bhad made no mention during the interview of 12 April, when he was summoned by the defender because of suspected corruption. It had failed to speak of office from his wife Gloria Piermarini for the restructuring of the gardens of Salaria Sport Village, the club that Anemone had a partnership with the son of Angelo Balducci. Contracts on which they were willing new findings.

houses for the leader of Italia dei Valori
When the interrogation is to stop prosecutors Sergio Sottani and Alessia Tavernes Zampolini ask whether it is aware of the kind of relationship there was between Balducci and Di Pietro, when the latter drove the infrastructure. The leader of Italia dei Valori has already been played in Florence as a witness claimed to have expelled the top official. Faced with investigators and his lawyer Grace Flight, the architect is silent. But on May 22 asking to be heard again. It reveals: "It is true that Peter kicked Balducci, was to leave him because he was pressed by the demands of the minister who wanted to be introduced in the Vatican. I know that just Balducci's did have rented two houses owned by the Congregation Propaganda Fide. The first is located in Via della Vite in the same building where the journalist lives Cesara Buonamici. Anemone dealt with the restructuring and then the apartment was used as the headquarters of Italy of Values. I do not know if he has never paid rent, however it was a very low figure. " Zampolini goes on: "I understand that Di Pietro also said another house was for her daughter. It is located in Via Quattro Fontane, and I remember Anemone, or one of his aides told me they were doing renovation work for the minister. " The architect explains that it was him to sign some of Dia, the "statements of work early," then filed with the City of Rome "even I was not always me to really care. "

Auditorium di Isernia to get the green light
According to the architect, when Peter was in power "opposed the contracts that were planned for the celebrations of the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy. Works were greatly desired by Romano Prodi and Francesco Rutelli, while he was against it. He was convinced only when the program of work was included in the Auditorium of Isernia, for which they were allocated 20 million euro. When she had approved the project gave him the green light to all the other works. " On 18 May, when he was questioned by prosecutors in Perugia and Florence, Di Pietro said he was "A witness of the prosecution" and then clarified that it did not "never considered reliable nor Balducci, nor Peter Rinaldi," later became Commissioner for World Championships and is still under investigation for corruption because it accused of accepting money and favors from Anemone . A version that Zampolini denied.

Plans for La Maddalena
During his questioning of ten days ago, Zampolini focused on the dynamics of the "system" set up to manage the work and said that "during the Prodi government in view of my projects G8 summit in La Maddalena and works for the celebrations of the Unity of Italy were discarded because they were privileged others. " In particular, he had two names. "Those who worked were Stefano Boeri, who was a friend of Prodi and Rutelli. And the Neapolitan architect who was a friend of Walter Veltroni. This is probably the professional who has also dealt with the restructuring of the loft overlooking the Circus Maximus was the first headquarters of the Democratic Party. The name appears in the Boer trial papers. Record the carabinieri del Ros: "In the late evening of July 31, 2008 report to the architect Marco Casamonti colleague Stefano Boeri, who has been entrusted with the overall design of the works of the G8 to Mary Magdalene, that the Giaf Construction (Carducci Valerio), awarded to one of these works (a hotel) asked him to prepare the design of a spa having verified that the project prepared by the technical authority, architect Giovanni Facchini, is absolutely lacking ... "I phoned for this ... I called one of the companies that won the races at the G8 ... to Mary Magdalene ... who are the ones that have made us ... you know ... the competition of the Auditorium Florence. ... And I have come to Magdalene gave us the assignment to make him a kind of spa for the hotel ... but it seems that the hotel has designed a Facchini a name ... so ... and says it's a horrible thing ... but you've seen this project of the hotel? Is it really so bad? ". Boeri, after confirming that the company Giaf Construction is difficult to carry out the work because of deficient design, to communicate Casamonti who will arrange a meeting with the engineer Angelo Balducci edificatoria that coordinates all activities. "

Fiorenza Sarzanini
June 2, 2010

Best Rated Boat Duck Paint

Even Formica is innocent. After 17 years

Formica acquitted after 17 years
Giancarlo Perna (the Journal May 27, 2010)

The former minister of the PSI was 66 years at the beginning of the ordeal, now has 83. The robe that has unjustly impeached now senator of the Democratic Party. Political processes acquitted after the river: by Mannino

Andreotti was accused of bribery, Rino Formica has been fully acquitted 17 years later: he had not pocketed anything. Meanwhile, eight-time Socialist minister has gone from 66 years as it was in '93, when the trial began, the current 83. Fortunately for him, he is alive, lucid and can savor the victory. Could andargli worse. But in the meantime has come since then with the policy that was his life and was still in store for satisfaction. He was ostracized, surrounded by suspicion, overwhelmed with ironies.

Formica was in the 80s and early 90s a powerful politician and a number of the PSI in Puglia. Was suspected to have benefit in exchange for bribes, the company Emit of Milan for the construction of conveyor belts at the port of Manfredonia. After a trial Foggia lasted eleven years, was sentenced to four years and six months. It took another six years before, the day before yesterday, the Court of Appeal of Bari to discharge him for not having committed the crime. Previously, it had already been acquitted - with the same size - the accusation, just as phony, of intrigues with the king of the clinics in Puglia, Francesco Cavallari. A scandal queen passes for evidence of corruption of penta in the First Republic. Defendants were prominent Formica and Democrat, Vito Lattanzio. The case lasted 14 years and ended in December last year. Formica and Lactantius and the totality of the alleged perpetrators (31 people) were acquitted in both first and second instance. For clinics, Formica and Lactantius spent months under house arrest. Formica said the experience also a matter for the Emit.

licenses Cases Justice feet. Now, the usual admirers will say that the gowns at the end, though, justice has triumphed. The same Rino, visibly relieved, said at the end of the process Emit: "I had confidence in the judiciary and have been rewarded. The judges pass, justice remains. A judge knows that the judiciary still exists. " Joy is a funny thing, pride does the rest. Understandably proud of having resisted judicial killings, the former minister did not want to punish him.

We did not have to live instead of his own vicissitudes, we are much more imbufaliti. I find it crazy that a guy should spend a quarter of its existence in the clutches of judges before being aware of his innocence. It is a system: it is torture state. They have caught you, sneak into your life and more than ready to ruin it, at least one thing they have a duty to do: stand out. No holiday, gentlemen, you are required insomnia until the truth comes out. Instead, you who have broken the eggs in the basket, you feel entitled to force me to swallow your omelette. Tangentopoli, in which the event is part of Formica, with its overwhelming majority in acquittals father died, he stepped on a basic principle: the reasonable duration process.

The times are not an independent variable of justice, especially the political one. Why, right now Formica was acquitted, but his party - and also applies to DC, PRI, PLI, etc. meanwhile disappeared. To claim it was not so much as the lengthy investigations of biblical inquiry. Nothing can withstand 15 or 20 years of investigations. Others take the place of parties and lame at the end, the entire political geography of a country is artificially changed. This is the essence of the Italian judicial revolution, rightly called "false revolution."

Open the proceedings against him, the innocent ant has not been re-elected in Parliament in '94 and has since retired. He was a capable minister and a free spirit. When he saw the triumphant craxismo adventurers is queued interested dubbed the National Assembly of the PSI as a jumble of "dwarfs and dancing girls." It has never been a guy who sent her to say. He said his dispute with another temperament peperino, dc Nino Andreatta, which caused the fall of the second government Spadolini 82. Nino was Secretary of the Treasury, Rino Finance. Andreatta, who did not like Craxi, said that the PSI was a policy "Nazi." The allusion to Nazism did not like of course ant was furious. Andreatta, mocking, justified himself saying that he had used the term English and even though it proposed to say "national socialism." Rino, dissatisfied, he continued to tease and Andreatta reacted by sticking the label of 'commercial in Bari. "

replication Formica was lightning, "Andreatta? A gossip on the balcony. " He tenderly remembered today that Max D'Alema sent reporters "to fuck off."
Unemployed and waiting for the judiciary, with a comfortable, staggered, Rino has been recycled into a political analyst. It has been demonstrated acute and precise, not touched by age. He has worked in the New Socialism of reasons, magazine Emanuele Macaluso, a former Communist from the pack. Faithful to the memory of Craxi, has made a memorable speech in January for the tenth anniversary of his death. He even founded a movement, Socialism and Freedom, siding - who knows why - with the center where lurk all who wanted to hurt. Today is the father of former noble Apulian psi and beyond.
thing could end here if the same Formica had said on leaving the court two days ago: "It is the judiciary that is sick. We are sick of the judiciary. " Asked to explain, he added: "In the Hands of clean politics and the interplay between the judges was undeniable. There will come a time when they apply to the account of regime profiteers. " And did the name of Alberto Maritati, the prosecutor of Foggia that the wrongly indicted twice, stating: "For years, Senator is the Democratic Party. That stuff, that entanglement between the judiciary and dishonesty, there was in those years in Foggia. " It is not a compliment. Indeed, a clear allusion to a strategy of that court to liquidate pm.

Maritati is a gown that has always had political ambitions. '83 Was a candidate for the Socialists in the Chamber of Claudio Signorile. He fiasco and since then, they say, has moved out of hatred for Psi and allies. The fact is that he was put in trouble the penta in Apulia with both clinics with conveyor belts. I do not know what evidence he had. But it is not a big gap because those who, if he had, were then thrown to the winds even by his colleagues. Married has also distinguished himself for having discovered, ten years after the fact, that D'Alema had taken a bribe from that Cavallari King clinics.

confirms it the same Max during an interrogation. In the minutes, the prosecutor - that he could no longer charged with occurred amnesty - praised the tangent with the mustache for his "loyal declarations." Maritati The following year he was elected senator in the Democratic Party share D'Alema. Still is. Perhaps, evoking the "profiteers regime," Formica was reckless. But it also wrong?

Jack And Sally Seat Covers

Chronicles Kantian / 2

The third day of the Congress Kant (Monday, May 24) The conference was opened by Karl Ameriks and Alfredo Ferrarin. Ameriks focused its report on the ambiguity of Kantian cosmopolitanism, while the prof. Ferrarini (University of Pisa) put in the middle of his speech the Architecture of Pure Reason, that is a part of the Doctrine of the Method of the first Critique. The Architecture is the art of the system, but in the case of Kant's system is not given by this or that philosophy in certain way, but the reason that in itself poses its own purposes. And 'this conception of metaphysics, science as the ultimate ends of human reason, which, according Ferrarin, embodies the true concept of Kantian philosophy, and that may lead to a different key to the whole work. At Kant's moral action was dedicated to Barbara Herman, Manfred Baum and focused its attention on the relationship between freedom and law in Kant's practical philosophy.

In the afternoon, I think the most anticipated event was the report of Marcus Willascheck, perhaps the best known of kantisti generation, which has dealt with the impossibility of intuition ration in the first Critique. As usual, the undersigned was somewhere else, namely the meeting of Metaphysics and Ontology, where two young scholars, Giuseppe Motta (Mainz) and Toni Kannisto (Oslo) were at the center of their relations with the problem of how Kant, while Arnaud Pelletier discussed on '(im) possibility of defining the categories, an issue that I faced myself in my speech. The ambiguity of Kant's text, in fact, be solved if one considers that, in the second edition of the Critique of Rag. pure, Kant says that it will provide only a "Erklaerung" (explanation) of the categories and not a "Definition". A definition of the categories, the first schematic, turns into an obvious circle: because the categories are not identical to the schematic forms of the proceedings, and one can not define the forms of proceedings without them. Only the schematic, providing a category "objective reality", will enable them to be distinguished from the forms of assessment, but it is doubtful if it consists of a definition of "real" because, according to the letter of the text, only the mathematical concepts are left to define (ie, only those concepts that are resolved completely in their schematization, and this is not the case of the categories).

Tuesday, May 25 I missed the first session, it seemed very important to know if that is a Kantian "critique of reason, post-colonial" or "reason Kant has a color" (and is not a joke). Gianni Vattimo has not come, and we could not find out if the interpretation of Kant is a philosopher, and was very much appreciated the honor of Baroness O'Neill coferenza on the theme of Kantian cosmopolitanism in relation the contemporary cosmopolitanism.

The afternoon saw two parallel symposia, one on the theme of cosmopolitanism (with Thomas Pogge, Reihnard Brandt and Massimo Mori), on the other "essential ends of human reason", with Paul Guyer, Jean Ferrari and Norbert Hinske. Hinske, in particular, discussed the difference between philosophy in the cosmic sense (of which Kant speaks in the aforementioned Architecture) and in the cosmopolitan sense, but not without a turn arrow at the prof. Brandt of Marburg (and of course then the result of the two parallel symposia). The absence of Francois Marty then prevented me fi feel in the interpretation of Opus Postumum provided by Vittorio Mathieu (which fell within the section on the concept of Kantian philosophy). Much followed, however, the Nicholas De Warren report on the relationship between Husserl and Kant.

Wednesday, May 26th will be remembered as the day of the conference by Robert Brandom, but for those who (like myself) prefer to analytic philosophy transcendentalism, it will be quite beautiful on the day of the conference by Wolfgang Carl (Goettingen), dedicated to clarify the meaning of the "Copernican revolution". In fact, Carl has broadened the discussion to the explanation of the school term (which Kant uses) "form dat them guilty" and has rightly stressed the indissoluble link between form and possibilities. The Copernican revolution does not say, in fact, to determine which is the mind (or, worse, create) the object, but says it is the mind (the shape of our thinking and our sense) to constitute the very possibility of objectivity. The transcendental form is always the possibility, while the possibility is always a possibility given a priori (a finite mind of its own). Closed plenary sessions prof. Mario Caimi, winner of the Kant-Preis, who proposed a new interpretation of the chapter on the schematic. The schematic is different from the transcendental deduction justified because while the first constitution of the object in general, the second allows the application of object categories also empirical. In general, I believe that this interpretation raises more problems than it solves, but certainly part of a real problem: that of reconciling the two perspectives present within Kantianism, one for which the object (any object) is given and one for which it is a construct of the intellect (as required by the deduction). The opposition is mitigated when one considers that the deduction allows you to build the object from the formal point of view, which still requires two aspects of the experience (which corresponds to the duality postulates the possibility and the reality).

Mario Salieri Online Stream Ise-x

on Civil Defence and its ...

Anyone who knows me knows that I, a Catholic reactionary and anti-liberal, are not properly a Berlusconi. Often, however, I am compelled to defend even the indefensible, in the face of bad faith and intellectual dishonesty of some left our local.

Since the beginning of the story of the earthquake we have witnessed the transformation of the tragedy that hit my town in a sleazy party-political theater: on the one hand, the Berlusconi government's tendency to exploit the merits acquired in the management of a electoral purposes, the other part of the usual left Italiot attempt to denounce, with the same purpose, the flaws, real and perceived, of the Civil Protection Bertolaso \u200b\u200blicense plate.

This is the level of decline of the Italian public debate: far from accepting his own faults or reasons for the opponent, are the ideological prejudice to prevail. We formulate preconceived thesis, putting then in search of evidence to substantiate. If reality is in the opposite direction, so much the worse for reality.


Now, the investigation of Florence is to fit into this picture very edifying of itself: so, who until recently stirred briskly in the dark does not ring true to finally expose the criminal nature of the alleged "system "Berlusconi-Bertolaso. Do not hesitate, in other words, to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

I do not think the case, however, to create a situation in which, as the saying goes, "all cows are black." Indeed, those who want to get an idea of \u200b\u200bthe honest question has a duty to distinguish some plans that continue to be artificially confused.

What the civil protection has become a system overload and too likely to create situations far from transparent, it was clear to myself for many years.
This is a 'political' question, on which discussions could be held peacefully, if it were not transformed in the usual, tiresome controversy between Berlusconi and anti-Berlusconi, the final frontier for the defense of democracy and the rule of law by an alleged authoritarian tendencies. On the other hand, bureaucratic reasons that led to the necessity of giving powers to the PC so "heavy" and procedures as "light" are still in place and can not be solved simply by denying that in this country, there is a problem time of the administrative decision and its implementation.

That when there are contracts for half of tens of millions of euro is causing them some appetite on the part of employers and that this may lead to a corruption, the undersigned has understood since, in the words Craxi, wearing pants plus-fours. The judiciary has assumed
corruption for officials of the Civil Protection is a legal issue (penalty to be precise). We let the judiciary do its job and we'll talk in a few years, knowing that, as we remember our dear Republican Constitution, every citizen shall be considered not guilty until the last instance.

Emergency Management earthquake and the early phases of reconstruction by the PC was effective or not? This is a technical issue. Some may think that the CASE project was an unnecessary and costly waste of a villain public money, the housing crisis could be addressed through other modes of action, on the other hand there are still many problems to be addressed and that, ultimately, little has been done was done wrong.
These positions are legitimate, which could be discussed, though even here not everything had changed, since April 6, in a bleak play, in which the work of the Government and the PC was considered as the Heaven on Earth or how bad the Absolute according to those who formulated the opinion that the proceedings had on the figure of Silvio Berlusconi.
Personally, I am in the housing of the CASE project to me I find Bazzano well. Maybe someone else would have preferred to settle for a few years in a container provided by the PC, as happened to the earthquake in Umbria and Marche. All tastes are to be met. But as a child I learned that rule of politeness is not biting the hand that you eat, so the Aquila placed in homes that have as their favorite hobby to shoot zero on the project could make a gesture of great dignity, give up their accommodation and rent a container, using the assistance of independent accommodation.
Above all, it is intellectually honest, as I said, mixing the technical with the political-ideological and even by the judiciary on the basis of this improper confusion happens that the surveys mentioned above (which is not more than marginally L'Aquila) are used to make ex-post evaluations on the work of the Government and the PC in the post-earthquake.

There were entrepreneurs who, on April 6, laughing under the covers at the news of the earthquake and the thought of the lavish affairs that the reconstruction would have allowed? In the face of such misery, one can only feel anger and outrage, even though those who know the worst side of human nature is not it surprising at all. But it is a moral issue on two individuals: in any case it may be confused with the earlier plans. Who uses this episode to give new legitimacy to his political judgment / technical management Bertolaso \u200b\u200bis intellectually dishonest and makes operation of looting, the same way as those two gentlemen.

Maybe if the fine to hurt us in this way, thinking about Aquila Arcore (or Palazzo Grazioli), we could all work together to rebuild the city's true and maybe this will revert to fly much faster.

Pin For Bluetooth Notebook 5000

Chronicles Kantian / 1

In a small pause, I am going to write a chronicle very bland and very selective of the first two days of the XI International Congress of Kant, which opened yesterday in Pisa and ending Wednesday, May 26. For more information undoubtedly the most detailed and objective, you can consult the website of the Congress (www.kant2010.it).
The conference opened yesterday morning and, after registration and greetings of the authorities, we have witnessed in the plenary conference of Henry Allison, the uniqueness of the categorical imperative. Allison is a giant (in every sense, having regard to its height) of Kantian studies, but the conference was difficult for the use of a variety of symbols and numbers to indicate the various formulations of the categorical imperative that Kant provides in the " Foundation of the Metaphysics of Morals, "which, if in a written text can serve mo 'schema are difficilisse to keep in mind during a report Oral. Work
afternoon are not able to describe them carefully, for the simple reason that at that moment I was committed (in my small way) to defend the thesis of my contribution during a panel section on Ontology and Metaphysics, involving different people, including signal, only a Portuguese girl, author of a contribution very nice (and very clearly written in German) on the concepts of reflection, particularly on the concepts of matter and form. Then I happened to attend a panel devoted to another of Kant's philosophy of mathematics (where I got to hear the good contributions of Vincenzo De Risi and Luke Bellotti), moderated by Professor Mirella Capozzi, who has made me a kantista happy when he claimed in no uncertain terms that there is a problem for Kant the object (realism vs. idealism, etc.). but a problem of objectivity of knowledge, that is, those rules (operational) that allow two or more people agree and agree upon a concept (in other words, I know objectively what the concept x when I can set up an operation similar to it which makes it usable by anyone).
the evening, after a good dinner (buffet) and some comments on the game's importance, there was another plenary session to hear what is probably the most famous living philosopher John Searle (although my Friends tell me it hegelofili more famous Robert Brandom, who will be the Congress in the coming days). Searle's conference was very pleasant, but he left little doubt, that perhaps I will talk soon. I will only add that today there was even a (unexpected) comparison between Searle and Maurizio Ferraris on the theme of "social objects", which, however, I did not attend in person (I limit myself, therefore, to report the news).

The whole day was opened by the beautiful Remi Brague conference on "Kant and the gnostic temptation." I wonder if Brague was aware that the same term was used by Gadamer to characterize the claim of Hegel's answer to the religion in his philosophical system, but the meaning is different, because Brague correctly concluded that Kant avoids Gnosticism (so its still only a 'temptation') because his philosophy is not a negation of the material world and the finite size. Brague quoted a passage from the "Critique of Practical Reason," but it was quite possible to quote the famous image of the dove that flies only because of air resistance (and not despite it). The next conference related to Kant and Habermas and the role of religion in public life. Anyone who has ever peeled Habermas knows what it is verbose and abstruse writing. Imagine the conference on Habermas (a good reason that has led myself to put out the simultaneous translation headphones, because The rapporteur spoke German very fast). Finally, Claudio La Rocca discussed the relationship between method and system in Kant, while Beatrice Longuenesse tried a parallel between Kant and Freud on the doctrine of self. On Freud did not express myself, although I agree with the comment of Wolfgang Carl, who believes the doctrine of Freud 'unsinnig' and rightly pointed out that the problem of Kant is not so much the "I" (which could well be called: principle of unity of experience), but the identity of the reference.
In the afternoon, I simply point out the reports Massimo Barale (on a comparison of Kant and the philosophy of mind of 900) and Patricia Kircher, Columbia University, on validity of arguments for transcendental apperception. Curiously, Professor Kircher also interested in Freud and wrote a famous book on the psychology of Kant. Barale, however, supported the argument that the philosophy of mind, particularly the classic functionalism and connectionism, are insufficient to account for the individual character of man, and added that a version manuals and de-trascendentalizzata Kant (such as the spread, following Strawson and Bennett, in the Anglo-Saxon literature) consists well with the classic functions, this does not apply to the real issue of transcendentalism. Unfortunately, time is running out and did not allow the continuation of report (containing the positive version of Kantianism second Barale). To combat the interpretations too analytical Kant, however, a good antidote is the beautiful volume of Allison, "Kant's Transcendental Idealism," which does justice to many misunderstandings, and to be placed on the same floor of a classic like the old (but not dated) commentary HJ Paton.

Nightmare Before Christmas Sally Seat Covers

Apologetics for Dummies

Yes, I know you are out purchasing new books on Scrovegni. But I do not I read them and I really like the traditional version of history: Henry built the chapel and then profiting from indulgences of which it would have been checked.
I say this because it is clear that I am not exactly an apologist for what is said.
Finding a dinner with the Anglican below, I extolled the beauty of these frescoes by Giotto. I remember how, in general, the Chapel was an investment not only to earn heaven, but also to make money. And he replies: "This is why we made the reform." To which I objected: "You will be reformed as well, but not c'avete Giotto."

Ultimately I think the point is just that, and I like how he dealt with the card. Caffarra during the Via Crucis, last Easter, the Church has nothing more to offer than the forgiveness of Christ.
that loss with which Peter, after having betrayed Jesus, is able to tell him she loves him, as he said today's Gospel.
Why I like the story of a money lender who offers to allow his art to speak of Giotto. Wear is a disgusting act. But the beauty that is reflected in the art of Giotto also came to erase this crime.
Alas, the moral world - which is also reflected in the mindset of our Protestant friends - can not understand these things. Such a slogan: if you do not recognize our limitations, we do not understand that we need forgiveness from God, and if we do not need Christ, even we do not need his Church.

But the truth, as we know, is quite another. We are sinners, as St. Peter and also much more of him. But Christ came to redeem us and His forgiveness is there offered through the sacraments, we are recovering the lost grace (baptism and confession) or increase it if already there.

Certainly not alligavit potentiam Deus suam Sacramentis. But sadness fills my heart with pass in front of the confessional in which he confessed to as the Anglican CS Lewis (from what I saw it yesterday).
What should be our gratitude for being part of the church that dispenses true sacraments? And 'maybe something so great that we can not understand it, as we strive.

Best Thermal Compound For 2010

Professor. Fields and the praise of the civil servant

For years we went on with the story of Berlusconi, the cult of personality, flattery, exaggerated dell'elogio (until the personification of All these properties Sandro Bondi). All true, I do not discuss. But, then, because when Bondi said that Berlusconi is a saint or that is beautiful or what seems to you all (I repeat: rightly) laughing and scompisciano, and when, in fact, it is said that a president of the Chamber is 'emblem of the modern right, which is a man of sound moral principles, that the real political (or even who is the embodiment of the rebel Juenger, as it was written, alas, a great journalist as Marcello Staglieno) No laughter but lots and lots of applause, even from the ranks of the Democratic Party and the Left chic (like Andrea Camilleri who signs the preface of the book of finiano Granada)?

The climax was reached from the intellectual flagship of the patrol Finian, the oft-quoted prof. Alessandro Campi, who, on his last article on the reform (front page of today), deserves a gold Bondi, but tapir. You had the illusion that Fini had become the emblem of the liberal right and piaciona? Instead we are left with a sort of all'amatriciana Sarkozy who, in the absence of Carla Bruni, is writing to her husband (free and slave, not a berluscones) and ghostwriter (once you say "negro," but I guess this wording does not like the new course finiano) an articulate defense of civil servants, which is a true masterpiece of hypocrisy and political Jesuitism all Italian. The statists are rediscovered Finian (perhaps because they realized that their votes came from there) and hit the ground running to defend the state, Brunetta and mistreated by those bad leaguers, for once the bearers of a "free and efficient vulgata, which returned to bully move for some time "and which identifies mostly in the state" southern historically accustomed to keep himself from others and reluctant to settle down. "

But no, says the prof. Fields, the real enemies of the people are not the slackers and the southern state, but rather small and medium entrepreneurs in the North, who do not pay taxes, and (we add) have the nasty habit of voting and the Northern League to complain the fact that their money is wasted unnecessarily. In short, the teacher undresses on the role of the refined intelligence of the modern right to wear those (easier axis) of the demagogue that defends the civil sword: "And in any case, for demagoguery demagogy, the system does more harm to the employee that clocks in and then go to the bar or the lawyer's cry declaring an income lower than that of his secretary, except to have the boat, three or four houses and powerful cars? does more harm to the public purse for the absentee caretaker fake illness or the artisan who ever does not charge any professional performance or, worse still, a farmer who raises costs of contracts won and then pay bribes to corrupt politicians in league with which it is? ".

I mean, who thinks that the real problem of our country are public employees, concludes Professor. Campi," or not has understood nothing of the evils that afflict us or have a hair on my stomach this big ".
waiting to spell the number of hairs on our stomachs, we would just say to the prof. Fields that, without wishing to bestow titles of merit or demerit, perhaps, deep down, there must also be said that the farmer and the artisan of the North that do not pay taxes are seeking (in a wrong way, I admit) to save what is the fruit of their labor and their families from the levy one was too greedy and is ready to squander their money so unfair and inefficient, while those for public officials (not all, but the problem is this: how to assess?) that are not what they are paid are paid with public money, that is, with all that money that, in the hands of the state, they always end up being anyone's money. But obviously those who say this have not understood anything about the real problems of the country, which are all and only those that appear on such to the shiny and modern. prof. A. Fields.

Peeing Alot And Headaches

No comment

Pregnant Dressy Dreses

And I pay


Ok, the almond paste is very good, the sun spends and the sea is magnificent. Theatrical Performance for thirty, thirty people is said in ancient Elea, home of Asclepius. At least ten actors, all very good. Translated text specifically (given the quality is reasonable to think that it will never accounted ...).

Just one question: who pays?

With the usual chutzpah to speak to a girl of the staff of the conference. Answer: Region (Campania), the City (of Ascea marina), the Banco del Cilento.

Some time ago I read that every 4 Eco di Bergamo Bergamo € that they pay in taxes back to Rome one in Bergamo. The situation is different for a more successful province bell (or just do not remember if Avellino Salerno): each euro paid, Rome is down 3. And the effects are seen.

For one thing: the regional Salerno-Sapri is quick, clean, the stations of Naples and Salerno have been renovated recently.
The Milan-Bergamo, as is known, is rather old and dirty. The station of Bergamo has dramatically due for an overhaul, but for now it is left as is.

Yeah. But then if six votes League xenophobic, populist, not supportive etc.etc. And can hardly be invited to dinner by the Cardinal of Milan, Isabella Bossi Nichi Vendola or Fedrigotti ...

Think of anything you like I hold the trout.

Terrasil Wart Treatmentreviews

San Domenico ecumenical Mezzanine

The title is a bit 'a contradiction in adiecto: How does St. Dominic de Guzman to be ecumenical? Just think to what was and what he did: walked the world to preach the Gospel, to have closed the pompous belief that truth which the Albigensian heretics denied it, yet at the same time sought. It was a terrible identity, did not understand the reasons of which he had overlooked, if not to bring them back to their schemes ("You say this, but in reality what you are looking for is what I t'annuncio "...). In short, according to the canons politically correct was a hateful fundamentalist, one not only convinced that truth exists, but that it might even discover and sharing, breaking the narrow circle of self and its desires, and so that we can achieve real freedom. One who believes that life is short, beautiful and worth living, with gratitude.
Then, as usual, the reality you find out what really amazes and St. Dominic is ecumenical. Of course, there will be organized interreligious meetings, but it seems that his love for Christ affects even those who grew up Anglican ("C of E", as they say here).
The fact is this. I have known for strange turns, the chaplain of Merton College. He, knew I was prenovices Dominican exclaimed something like, "Booyah! I believe that every Christian today should have the highest regard for the Order of St. Dominic. "
might sound like a statement of courtesy, but it was sincere. This man, convinced Anglican, High Church, tells me that it was in Bologna to visit the tomb of the saint and pray there. I'm really amazed: St. Dominic is not a saint and I know very few are those who pray. Discovering that an Anglican goes to Bologna just to pray at his tomb is one thing that leaves you speechless. He tells me then he is doing a PhD at Cambridge on St. Thomas - basically what we do is a similar argument - and I am confident his passion for the love of truth and clear thinking of Aquinas. I never cease to amaze me: Anglican gives us a lesson in love for the Catholic intellectual pursuit of truth.

I come to find out which is part of a group of Anglicans who seek to rediscover their traditions, searching for authentic teaching of Christ. Here in Oxford is hard not to think about Tractarians, which in mid-nineteenth century wanted to do the same way. Among them was Newman. And we know how it ended.

Catamaran Boat Motor Build

not afraid

Someone must have slandered Claudio Scajola. Because without that he had done nothing wrong, one morning he was forced to resign.

And that someone is almost all newspapers, including titles from the popular penis ensures that all of a sudden they started to take good anonymous letters, suspicious, imaginative reconstructions.

This is an extremely serious precedent, sufficient evidence that an investment of € 900 000 to create "evidence" to pull out at the appropriate time, 900 000 € enough to ruin a person and hold in check the entire democratic system. If the guarantor falls right under the blows of Farefuturo most vulgar, we can safely say goodbye to the liberal spirit of '94.

The main ingredient in this gross kitchen is once again the crust of the theorem "could not know" : Sciascia had much to write about the history of this target is not random, a politician rooted in the territory, as pragmatic as messy and not very accustomed to the Byzantine capital. Environmentalism billionaire in the country, where the thriving slow food and real powers, the ones that matter, remain in the shadows, impervious to shock any liberal politician streetwise might have expected a poisoned meatball; Minister Scajola gaffeur from the heart Golden, a lover of vintage cars and sports coverage, probably pay the initiative in travel to the end the choice of nuclear energy.

We believe we should pay particular attention to the sociological profile of this affair, are still on the grill Once a member of that very productive and northern ideological overlooked by major newspapers, crushed by the vice tax and mocked by the so-called salons. Without the proper proportions, and without examining the many here who also have been raised doubts about the fairness of the investigation, is a bit 'what happened even Olindo Romano, harassed from the outset by certain press and just perfect for guilty the media circus judiciary. Sure, perhaps it was just glamorous and à la page will not have had a particular taste in furnishing the house, nor the piece of feminist film forums and Fair, but it is clear that for some there is no sin worse than the left mark the distance from the psycho-anthropological touted by Fabio Fazio and company.

to be put into question is what is contemptuously called the shopkeeper mentality, at the time praised by Gigi Einaudi and still the only resource that enables us to keep up the cabin.

We hope to get back on track, U ministru , and as the fellow Enzo Tortora ask, perhaps during the inauguration of a nuclear power plant, "where were we?"

This post is dedicated to Silvio Scaglia, for 70 days under house arrest.

How Often Can U Take Steam

professionals sportsmanship

sorry to see two masters of such freedom and Giampiero Mughini Capezzone thickening, even if just for once, the fat band of professional moralists. The Biancoceleste biscuits served at the International FC is not the evidence of an alleged anomaly nostrana as complaining about the anti-Italian in continuous active service (just look at what happened yesterday at Anfield road). If anything, the ardor of fetishists of sportsmanship no ifs, ands or buts, those who ignore that at the end of season can breathe a bit 'breath, anticipating the third time in the second and perhaps the first, because in football the opponent is not the enemy, nor the sports press should look like to MicroMega; the short heat that feeds the Olympic pagan rhetoric but that is totally alien to the Judeo-Christian tradition, since the true spirit of competition contrast with Darwinian nightmare feared by some old-Marxists. The risk now is that this episode is used as a crowbar to force the old reluctance to impose new strings and snares in one area of \u200b\u200bsport has always been able to regulate themselves, where the ancient wisdom of knowing how their forces in the determination of ' optical medium to long term - combined with the passion that will horrify rationalist atheists but that is the salt of every human experience - is one with the ineradicable freedom to have their own technical resources and tactics, conditio sine qua non for any project Cast efficiency. Honor and then the fans of Lazio, able to look beyond the result of a single batch, it is best to applaud the play football as a whole and become prey to the usual tribal logic, perhaps entrusting their hopes to some dull workaholic regime of the mission unimaginative. Before any regulation or federation is the natural law that God has set in stone. Hardly football fans were seduced by experts in the rules of honesty and scientists recreated in the laboratory; vain attempt to purify the feelings football unpleasantness from those that make them so unique and special. "Do not challenge the will of the people" said, no more than a month ago, Lazio Polverini. Let us remember always.

Yeduc Whats It Used For

wolves, eagles, owls and the country of Pulcinella

We are on the usual . The aftermath of the storm sollevatasi Inter-Lazio game, more or less comparable to the black cloud emitted from the volcano in Iceland, took the day progressed, with contours increasingly farcical.

Summary: the game last night was very important, perhaps decisive for the allocation of the 2009-2010 league title. Inter needed a win against Lazio was almost saved. A draw or a victory for Lazio was relaunched to great Rome: a nightmare for the young eagles from Lazio. So, also because of the twinning between the town and fans neroazzurra biancoceleste, it has taken to support Mourinho's side, with a vaguely threatening attitude towards his players, especially those - especially Muslera - that he even thought of putting our game. Of course Lazio players were intimidated and willingly played ato, except exceptions, as it were a friendly summer.

So, starting yesterday evening, AS Roma, Juventus, AC Milan are out and running, crying foul. They cried foul even neutral observers falsely, those ready to bark and bite the victim in turn to the orders of his master (who was also on duty).

not guaranteed to do at all costs, but let's take a moment to reflect.

The first questions to ask yourself is: which had never happened in the last league, a team that had already reached (or almost) the season goal play with less grim than usual? The answer is yes: in this way have been achieved such a lot of salvation, even unexpected. So it is not the case shocked right now. Of course, the Federation could have to play in contemporary challenges, this is one of the last few days, but it is the Federation that would radiate (or has already struck?) Luciano Moggi, then draw a veil pitiful.

The second question I ask myself is: instead of Lazio would have done the same? The answer this time is more complex. I'd probably find it very difficult if, for example, AC Milan was still in the race for the Scudetto Juventus and we were to meet him (as we do) the last day. Losing against the Rossoneri or deliver the championship neroazzurro hated rival? I mean, on these issues, you should not do the hypocrites: the psychology of the fan also includes this type of reasoning. It will be wicked, it will be unsportsmanlike, but it is reality. Of course, I would not be submitted to the stadium to cheer against My Team: I would rather stay home and retired in silence and waiting for the final verdict, not knowing what to expect. This was the sin of which have stained the Lazio fans and they could receive with simplicity what they judged the lesser evil, instead greeted him with shouts of joy. The lesser evil is even better than the greater evil, but it is always a bad thing. On the other hand, this sin, like all sins, especially harmful to them.

The third question is: what would happen if the Lazio player had his death and had forced the game to Inter draw or defeat? Here falls the ass. All people, especially journalists, who now assure us that he always knew it would end like this, it would be thrown against the conspiracy of the day before, claiming the virginity and cleanliness of Italian football of the year of grace 2010. In short, football is clean or dirty, depending on Sundays. Today is dirty, but if Sunday Inter draw with Chievo come back clean and smelling like the ass of a child. Proving that consistency, but also the intellectual honesty in this country are very rare qualities. And, above all, that few have the courage to face reality: that football is more than just a sport, that in this business, everyone tries to pull water to his mill and that the claim of it chaste and pure for the sole reason that he fired that bad guy Moggi has proved, as usual, the typical wishful thinking (or would have said Verga "trick question") of justicialism Italiot. Who in the past has sown the wind, now collects storm.

So while all those who compete in the biggest shot, I do take a nap. When the dust is cleared, please wake up: it is finally time to return to reality.

PS: I read the statement of Maurizio Gasparri, stating that "Inter can win the Scudetto, but for what we saw yesterday at the Olimpico will be a title similar to that achieved with phone calls Facchetti of the referees. " I am a fervent anti-Inter, but because I feel different and superior to the ridiculous perdazzurri I feel compelled to point out to the Gasparri, at a time when Facchetti telephoned De Santis, Inter badges do not win again. And if it comes to cardboard, well, what with phone calls Facchetti have little or nothing, but maybe you can ask questions to Guido Rossi.

Cherry Color Paint For Wall

The silence of the Turkish left onto Del

Luigi Manconi

Ottaviano Del Turkish, then President of the Abruzzo region, was arrested July 15, 2008 on charges of extortion. The magistrates of Pescara say that there is no evidence against him overwhelming, but subsequent investigations did not allow you to find one suspect in euro accounts in Italian or foreign. On the other hand, the objections raised in Del Turkish rely basically on the words of "regret" Vincenzo Angelini, who have documented the moment by moment, the whole procedure of "bestowal" of money without the record, however, 'the time of delivery and the identity of the benefit; and without that there is only one interception accusing Turkish. Then, two significant events: a report of the police which stated that Del Turkish would cut funds for 43ml to € clinics of his accuser as a result of fraud made by him, and finally, the same Angelini was arrested. And this makes it even more fragile against the prosecution's Turkish. Which was one of the "founders" of the Democratic Party, and now complains of being abandoned by what he regarded as his party and criticized the formula, so prevalent on the left, "let the courts work." It says: "When certain decisions weigh very heavily, it borders on complicity. In

Indeed, the "case of the Turkish" is so paradigmatic to lend itself to an interesting "exercise guaranteed." It graphically to highlight three of the handicap itself, ensure, so heavy as to constitute actual syndromes. 1): dell'Antipatico syndrome, or of the Turkish coach is not pleasant. But aside from the obvious considerations (as we are not very nice?), This should make it clear just of the guarantor. It is, worth double if strictly applied to those who do not particularly like it or not (from the President of the Council). In the case of Del Turkish, then, the "no sympathy" has an additional motivation of political reform has been a trade unionist and continues to be called socialist. Two badges are not particularly appreciated by many left (and not beloved by the writer), 2): The syndrome of the freezer, or of Turkish does not warm the hearts. The former governor has his own attitude, only marginal, anti-rhetoric and has set the entire defense in legal terms only, with meticulous attention, addresses all forms of intransigence protection and guarantees and totally focused on compliance procedural rules. A defense that the plot never cried and never emphasized its status as a "victim". This management "cold", not "throw in the politics," Del Turkish abducting even the most slender grounds of consent: and for a storiaccia bribes to shelters and can not be hearing a lot of emotional involvement, 3): The syndrome steer, or of the work leaves the Turkish judiciary. It is an invitation apparently wise but in fact dangerous. The criminal trial is still living a state of inequality between the parties, especially earlier in the trial. Therefore, that phrase ("let the courts work") expresses respect for the judiciary and shows sensitivity to the separation of powers, but could hypocrisy. It can be mistaken for indifference and subservience to a decision which, like all human choices, are fallible and therefore objectionable, and that, in cases like this can have very painful consequences. Thus, while fully respecting the responsibilities of each, the discussion on the individual acts of the judiciary must be allowed to develop freely, when it is expressed as an insult, attack, discredit. Indeed, the criticism can be useful in a modern rule of law, no institution should be considered not subject to public scrutiny and even less has become a totem in a sanctuary inaccessible or intangible.
If these warnings had been observed in the small "case of the Turkish" and other similar cases would have had a clearer financial guarantees and a more rigorous protection of suspects. That would benefit, first, the judiciary itself. And instead, the vast majority of the left and the Democratic Party has ignored all this: not to be worried lapped and compromised by a court of another member of his great prestige, the only left. Doing so has not only damaged Del Turkish: contributed to lower standards of protection of individual rights in criminal proceedings and to reduce the space of freedom for all.

from Unity
April 30, 2010

Kate Playground Blue Short

This explain many things ...

Fini and his soul (black?)
Fabrizio D'Esposito

A hawk liquid government so the question: "The Tulliani? You Fini's black soul. He is like being enslaved by her. "

In the triangle formed by Berlusconi's Palazzo Chigi, Palazzo Grazioli Humility and so are convinced that the long branch of the President of the Chamber is also nourished by a woman who has taken the place of Daniela Di Sotto: the blonde lawyer Elizabeth Tulliani. And to support the thesis, some reveal a story that dates back to 2004. A frame that acts as a prelude to the ferocious antiberlusconismo the new lady Fini. This

: prelude to Sandro Bondi, in his office in path of humility, at the time when Forza Italy. Bondi is the coordinator of the party (with Fabrizio Cicchitto deputy) and is the girlfriend of Tulliani Luciano Gaucci, explosive President Perugia's soccer. Gaucci and his partner are waiting to be received by Bondi. The European elections are coming and Tulliani requested and was granted an interview for a place in the list of central Italy forzista. Bondi welcomes two, listen to them, smiling at times and then dismisses them. He says a witness who remembers the "frame", "Bondi probably not even said anything to Mr Berlusconi." Tulliani, in fact, is not a candidate and soon after his story ends with Gaucci, even for the judicial vicissitudes of her fiance, fled to Santo Domingo. The passion between Fini and
Tulliani blazes in 2007 and immediately became matter of division between the Knight and his dolphin. And November of that year when Striscia la Notizia, on Channel 5, jokes about "princess of the known hole" on its TV debut and history with Gaucci. Fini, who already expecting a child by her new love, rages. And Mediaset is forced to an unusual memorandum signed by the Chairman Fedele Confalonieri, who distanced himself from the program by Antonio Ricci: "The derision that turns into mockery is not acceptable in relation to emotional choices that have nothing to do with public life of the country. " Berlusconi also spoke: "I called to tell me Fini saddened by the news service of the Strip. These are things that you do. "

Another crisis is only grazed in the summer of 2008. Fini Tulliani paparazzi are on a boat off Porto Ercole in lights began to semirosse. A post photos and Novella 2000, scoop debut of the new director Candida Morvillo. But there is around the whole sequence that has a final hard and someone takes it from circulation. Meanwhile, in An, starting with the first grumbling against the new partner of the head. Friends historians 'Gianfranco', which was suddenly the door slammed in your face, you do run half-heartedly: "She is doing a scorched earth around. Gianfranco has quarreled with almost everyone. The Donald is left alone (the most faithful Lamorte, ed) to be deleted. " The old reports of the National Alliance leader are replaced by the "family network" of Tulliani. Giancarlo's brother began to be I live in Viale Mazzini. Fiction, documentaries, different format. Constitutes society. Manufacturers of solid reputation, including Angelo Rizzoli, care, manager of the center shows some embarrassment and run the first voices, from reforming early last year.
The rest is a chronicle of those days. The campaign of the Journal of Victor Felts against Speaker of the House returned to the issue Rai, pulling in even the dance production company Gabriella Buontempo, wife of Fini's right-hand, Italo Bocchino. The scoop, however, is that for months Dagospia coté mocking the "contractor" that goes through Fini Casini to Montezemolo: this time it's an acronym, ATMedia, Tulliani's mother, Francesca Frau, to land in Viale Mazzini. Contracts with millionaires and Raidue Raiuno. The latter directed by Mauro Mazza, finiano doc, who yesterday privately delivered his version on the production of a talk in Italian Festival and entrusted the Absolute Media Television Frau: "I knew nothing of the" mother-in-law "Fini. I know Robert Quintin (due all'ATMedia ed) for 23 years and I trust him. I have not studied the composition of company when he came to talk to me. "

In any case, the "family network" Elizabeth Tulliani likely to result in several trouble Frondeurs the rebel of the PDL, as the hawks Berlusconi promised ominously. And to think that with her, ended in 2007 began a new life (two kids and many walking hand in hand in the Villa Borghese regularly reported in the weekly magazine Chi Alfonso Signorini) to get rid of a dangerous step: spokesman for the investigations on the former Thin Except those on the former wife Daniela Di below. Not to mention the scandal escort of another loyalist, Checchino Proietti, another chapter of feltrede antifiniana. And three-year term are still many ...

(from The Reform
Thursday, April 29, 2010)